google
yahoo
bing

Texas Progressive Alliance Weekly Round Up Feb 8, 2010

Posted by nytexan

The Texas Progressive Alliance congratulates the city of New Orleans for the Saints’ stirring Super Bowl victory, and reminds them that the “hair of the dog” trick doesn’t really help with the hangover.

The Texas Cloverleaf highlights the sentencing of GOP Denton County Constable Ken Jannereth. Probation, anger management, laying off the bottle, and maybe more to come for the disgraced lawman.

Could BeTrue of South Texas Chisme is watching 2 Texas Counties fight it out with their DAs over legal duties.

Bay Area Houston says Teabaggers claim illiterate Blacks elected Obama.

Is your gas wet or dry? Despite industry spin, it seems to not matter. TCEQ testing shows Barnett Shale “Dry Gas” health hazard. TXsharon thanks State Representative Lon Burnam for wading through the recent TCEQ testing report to find the truth. Bluedaze: DRILLING REFORM FOR TEXAS.

Over at TexasKaos, light seeker connects Obama’s big picture with our big picture, in Obama’s Problem is Our Problem In a Nutshell. Is our future Sarah Palin, Tea Partyers and failure?

This week at Left of College Station, Teddy interviews several members of the gay, lesbian, and bisexual community at Texas A&M while investigating what it is like to be gay in Aggieland. Left of College Station also takes a look at American’s ignorance of current events and the political process, and a report on the local campaign spending and donations. Left of College Station also covers the week in headlines.

The Nuge was campaigning for 39% over the weekend. Can’t you just feel the greasy, smelly excitement?

WCNews at Eye On Williamson looks at how the legislature is already laying the groundwork for adding sales taxes to items currently excluded like bottled water, basic internet service, and coin operated services, House Ways and Means Committee to look at “Certain Sales Tax Exemptions & Exclusions.

Off the Kuff looks at the effect of the “Citizens United” ruling on judicial elections in Texas.

WhosPlayin is neck-deep in local issues in North Texas, having spent the weekend with the Lewisville City Council at their retreat, and noting that he local school district is discouraging candidates from running for school board.

This week at Texas Vox Citizen Sarah geeked out on the new energy generation plan presented to Austin City Council. May not sound too snazzy but there’s enormous potential there to reduce carbon emissions, build up our local economy, and improve public health with this plan, so she thinks it is pretty cool.

Neil at Texas Liberal commented that office building janitors in Houston have set up a Facebook page as they prepare for a new round of contract negotiations in 2010. All work has merit and all people should be paid a living wage.

Yesterday was huge for New Orleans but it was also TeaBagger Rally Day in northwest Harris County, as PDiddie at Brains and Eggs recounted in “Rick and Ted’s (and Sarah’s) Excellent Super Bowl Sunday Venture”.

Sphere: Related Content

Conspiracies of Rich Men to Commit War Crimes and Aggression

Posted by nytexan


The establishment derides conspiracies and, for awhile, it was fashionable to deny the existence of ‘conspiracies’. In fact, conspiracies are how things get done. Very little is accomplished by one person working alone. If what is to be accomplished is illegal, the ‘conspiracy’ is called a ‘crime syndicate’ or ‘organized crime’.

If the ‘conspiracy’ in question is legal, however questionable, it is called a corporation or a business enterprise. Theorists on the high court have said corporations are people! But, should you call five idiots who have thus conspired to subvert the U.S. Constitution by the term ‘conspirators’, you are likely to be called a nut job! But SCOTUS believes mere words on paper is a real, living breathing person if it happens to have a seal on it supplied to you by the Delaware Secretary of State! So –I ask you –who is nuts?

The government often cites the specter of ‘organized crime’ in order to rally voters to a ‘right wing’ cause like ‘law and order’, a big issue in the 1960s. In order to fully exploit this ‘threat’, this ‘clear and present danger’ to the lives of middle America who seemed to have been cowering in fear, it was necessary to promote all manner of fears –hippies, black people, rock n’ roll, and crime syndicates. Law and order’ was, therefore, a big issue among the GOP hoping to exploit the fears of ‘hippies’ and ‘black people’ –both of whom were unhappy with increasing poverty, denial of rights, the seemingly endless, mindless and destructive war in Viet Nam. It was a war fought on behalf of a ‘conspiracy of rich men’ –ITT, Honeywell et al –all of whom hoped to make a killing with defense contracts.

George H. W. Bush, otherwise called Sr now, had hoped to achieve high office by exploiting those fears. It is no stretch to conclude that George H. W. Bush had made a Faustian bargain with the leadership of GOP. George H. W. Bush –by the time I met him –has already sold his soul to what St. Thomas More has already described as a ‘conspiracy of rich men to procure their commodities’.

The Senior Bush won two elections for a seat in the House of Representatives, but lost two bids for a Senate seat. It was in during one of his Senate races that I first met the Senior Bush who was not so well known when I interviewed Bush Sr with regard to this very issue. I was a very young reporter, somewhat naive, learning the ropes and had not yet made it to a major market or a network. Honestly –I did not know what to make of Bush’s ‘non’-answer. It consisted of slogans, buzzwords, and meaningless gobbledy gook. Little has changed. The Bush family still talks like that!

After Bush’s second race for the Senate, President Nixon appointed him U.S. delegate to the United Nations. He later became Republican National Committee chairman. He headed the U.S. liaison office in Beijing. It was years later, in Houston, that the Senior Bush would regale me with a story about how he was ‘duped’ into eating ‘dog lips’ –apparently a Chinese delicacy –at a formal, diplomatic dinner in the Forbidden City.

Bush would eventually become Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. At the time, many wondered what, precisely, was it that qualified Bush to head up the CIA, an agency that I have called ‘World’s Number One Terrorist Organization’. Despite his criticism of Reagan’s “voodoo economics” , Bush became Reagan’s running mate in 1980; by 1984, Bush had won acclaim for his devotion to Reagan’s conservative agenda. Thus would espouse an utterly failed policy and one that he himself has opposed. Reagan’s ‘voodoo economics’ caused a two year long recession, the deepest and most severe depression since Hoover’s great depression of 1929. But that clearly did not matter to Bush Sr. He would hitch his wagon to whatever star was ascendant and, at the time, it was the ascendant Ronald Reagan who would preside over a ‘conspiracy’ to sell arms to Iran, which was, at the time, an officially declared enemy of the United States, a sponsor of world wide terrorism. This ‘conspiracy’ on behalf of rich men would then funnel the proceeds of those sales to the so-called Contras in Nicaragua. There is a word for this: high treason:

  • The Iran/contra investigation will not end the kind of abuse of power that it addressed any more than the Watergate investigation did. The criminality in both affairs did not arise primarily out of ordinary venality or greed, although some of those charged were driven by both. Instead, the crimes committed in Iran/contra were motivated by the desire of persons in high office to pursue controversial policies and goals even when the pursuit of those policies and goals was inhibited or restricted by executive orders, statutes or the constitutional system of checks and balances.
  • The tone in Iran/contra was set by President Reagan. He directed that the contras be supported, despite a ban on contra aid imposed on him by Congress. And he was willing to trade arms to Iran for the release of Americans held hostage in the Middle East, even if doing so was contrary to the nation’s stated policy and possibly in violation of the law.
  • The lesson of Iran/contra is that if our system of government is to function properly, the branches of government must deal with one another honestly and cooperatively. When disputes arise between the Executive and Legislative branches, as they surely will, the laws that emerge from such disputes must be obeyed. When a President, even with good motive and intent, chooses to skirt the laws or to circumvent them, it is incumbent upon his subordinates to resist, not join in. Their oath and fealty are to the Constitution and the rule of law, not to the man temporarily occupying the Oval Office. Congress has the duty and the power under our system of checks and balances to ensure that the President and his Cabinet officers are faithful to their oaths.–Lawrence Walsh, Special Prosecutor, Concluding Observations, FINAL REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL FOR IRAN/CONTRA MATTERS

No one ever called Sr a ‘conspiracy theorist’. That’s because he was not a theorist; he was a ‘conspirator’ for real!

“I can perceive nothing but a certain conspiracy of rich men procuring their own commodities under the name and title of the commonwealth.”- Sir Thomas More (1478 – 1535), Utopia, Of the Religions in Utopia

Last time I checked the Cornell Univ Law Library and FINDLAW, I found hundreds if not thousands of court decisions, including SCOTUS, having to do with conspiracies large and small, of one sort or another. Someone should inform SCOTUS that conspiracies do not exist, but, I suspect, the very fact that they are recognized by the higher courts, including SCOTUS, creates them if they had not existed prior. In his ‘The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich’, William Shirer described what St. Thomas More would have called a ‘conspiracy of rich men’ to invade the nations of Europe, steal their resources and divide up the booty.

  • Goebbels was jubilant. “Now it will be easy,” he wrote in his diary on February 3, “to carry on the fight, for we can call on all the resources of the State. Radio and press are at our disposal. We shall stage a masterpiece of propaganda. And this time, naturally, there is no lack of money.”(2)
  • The big businessmen, pleased with the new government that was going to put the organized workers in their place and leave management to run its business as it wished, were asked to cough up. This they agreed to do at a meeting on February 20 at Goering’s Reichstag President’s Palace, at which Dr. Schacht acted as host and Goering and Hitler laid down the line to a couple of dozen of Germany’s leading magnates, including Krupp von Bohlen, who had become an enthusiastic Nazi overnight, Bosch and Schnitzler of I. G. Farben, and Voegler, head of the United Steel Works. The record of this secret meeting has been preserved.
  • Hitler began a long speech with a sop to the industrialists. “Private enterprise,” he said, “cannot be maintained in the age of democracy; it is conceivable only if the people have a sound idea of authority and personality . . . All the worldly goods we possess we owe to the struggle of the chosen . . . We must not forget that all the benefits of culture must be introduced more or less with an iron fist.” He promised the businessmen that he would “eliminate” the Marxists and restore the Wehrmacht (the latter was of special interest to such industries as Krupp, United Steel and I. G. Farben, which stood to gain the most from rearmament). “Now we stand before the last election,” Hitler concluded, and he promised his listeners that “regardless of the outcome, there will be no retreat.” If he did not win, he would stay in power “by other means . . . with other weapons.” Goering, talking more to the immediate point, stressed the necessity of “financial sacrifices” which “surely would be much easier for industry to bear if it realized that the election of March fifth will surely be the last one for the next ten years, probably even for the next hundred years.”
  • All this was made clear enough to the assembled industrialists and they responded with enthusiasm to the promise of the end of the infernal elections, of democracy and disarmament. Krupp, the munitions king, who, according to Thyssen, had urged Hindenburg on January 29 not to appoint Hitler, jumped up and expressed to the Chancellor the “gratitude” of the businessmen “for having given us such a clear picture.” Dr. Schacht then passed the hat. “I collected three million marks,” he recalled at Nuremberg.(3)

—-William Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, The Nazification of Germany: 1933–34

We are fortunate that no one ‘informed’ informed Shirer that conspiracies do not exist before he bothered unearthing the mountain of Nazi documents that prove the meeting, the Nazi conspiracy to wage war and genocide for the benefit of global corporations that participated. This meeting of ‘industrialists’ took place just as surely as did the meeting of Dick Cheney’s ‘Energy Task Force’ which carved up an ‘allotted’ the oil fields of Iraq long before the events of 911 would give these ‘conspiractors’ the pre-text they would require to attack Iraq, wage war upon that nation and, in the process, steel its resources for the likes of Dick Cheney’s own Halliburton and other members of an energy consortium.

The results were published in a ‘National Energy Policy’ report in May 2001, several months before 911 would give them the pretext to make the report come true. This is precisely the kind of of conspiracy that had been described so accurately, precisely by St. Thomas More in his “Utopia”, a classic of English literature.

  • I can perceive nothing but a certain conspiracy of rich men procuring their own commodities under the name and title of the commonwealth.
  • They invent and devise all means and crafts, first how to keep safely, without fear of losing, that they have unjustly gathered together, and next how to hire and abuse the work and labor of the poor for as little money as may be. These devices, when the rich men have decreed to be kept and observed for the commonwealth’s sake, that is to say for the wealth also of the poor people, then they be made laws. But these most wicked and vicious men, when they have by their insatiable covetousness divided among themselves all those things, which would have sufficed all men, yet how far be they from the wealth and felicity of the Utopian commonwealth? Out of the which, in that all the desire of money with the use of thereof is utterly secluded and banished, how great a heap of cares is cut away! How great an occasion of wickedness and mischief is plucked up by the roots!Sir Thomas More (1478 – 1535), Utopia, Of the Religions in Utopia

Another example is Heinrich Heydrich’s infamous meeting at Wansee, attended by Nazi bureaucrats, and corporate kiss ups. Over a civilized lunch, this ‘conspiracy of rich men’ planned the extermination of the jews of Europe.

  • … within a few months after the meeting, the first gas chambers were installed in some of the extermination camps in Poland. These six camps, Belzec, Birkenau, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor, and Treblinka were in operation in Poland.
  • Responsibility for the entire project was placed in the hands of Heinrich Himmler, Reichsführer-SS, and head of the Gestapo and the Waffen-SS.
  • The Wannsee Conference did not mark the beginning of the “Final Solution.” The mobile killing squads were already slaughtering Jews in the occupied Soviet Union. Rather, the Wannsee Conference was the place where the “final solution” was formally revealed to non-Nazi leaders who would help arrange for Jews to be transported from all over German-occupied Europe to SS-operated “extermination” camps in Poland. Not one of the men present at Wannsee objected to the announced policy. Never before had a modern state committed itself to the murder of an entire people.

–The Wannsee Conference, Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team

Very little is EVER accomplished by one person working alone unless you happen to be Michelangelo. Conspiracies exist! Our own Supreme Court has said so and, by law, they have defined themselves as ‘infallible’. They are, themselves, of late, a conspiracy of Republicans to subvert the Constitution.

Because conspiracy –in fact –exist, wars will continue to be fought by the poor for the benefit of the rich. The mechanism by which this is accomplished is called the military-industrial complex. It’s job is to divide the spoils of war among Dick Cheney’s oil buddies and other ‘paid thugs’ like Blackwater, who conveniently hide behind the moniker –’defense contractor’.

For eons wars have been fought for booty! That’s why the US fights them today. Rome invaded Dacia for the gold. The U.S. wages war in the Middle East for oil, the booty du jour! To deny one the right to oppose those wars –as Supreme Court Justice Holmes denied Eugene Debs –is a recipe for military dictatorship. In a text-book example of the false analogy, Holmes likened Debs’ opposition to U.S. entry in WWI to yelling ‘fire in a crowded theater’. I ask: isn’t it more dangerous NOT to shout fire if the theater really is on fire?

Today –the theater is on fire. Our government has repeatedly failed us on almost every front. We are expected to die abroad in order to enrich numerous conspiracies of rich men –oil barons, arm merchants, the very minions of the Military-Industrial Complex. Corporations, we are told, are people and the conspiracy we used to dignify with the term –Supreme Court –has said so! And I ask you: if the MIC is not a ‘conspiracy of rich men’, then what is? If the Supreme Court has not deteriorated into a conspiracy of right wing ideologues, then why are not the dictionaries re-written and the thousands of pages of case law burned or dumped offshore so that we cannot learn the truth for ourselves. We are expected to buy the lies and die for this wicked, venal conspiracy. Well, I won’t and never will!

St. Thomas More would have called the Military-Industrial complex and their shills on K-street a “conspiracy of rich men to procure their commodities in the name and title of the commonwealth!” [See: Thomas More, Utopia] This is why wars have been waged throughout the ages! If Justice Holmes were alive, I would tell him that it is wrong NOT to yell fire in a crowded theater if the theater is, indeed, on fire! At this moment in our history, the American republic is threatened, and among those threatening it is the US Supreme Court itself!

I am yelling FIRE! FIRE! FIRE!

Sphere: Related Content

Former Houston Mayor Trying To Whitewash His Record

Posted by nytexan

Bill White Uses TV Commercial to Write Revisionist History

AUSTIN-Former Houston mayor and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Bill White released his second television ad today-”Meet Bill White,” which will air statewide in both English and Spanish starting Friday evening.

One thing the ad doesn’t do is tell the truth about Bill White’s record as Houston’s mayor. “White is trying to whitewash his record. They are using a television ad to craft a revisionist history of his term as mayor,” said Kelly Love Johnson, Communications Director for Democratic Gubernatorial Candidate Farouk Shami.

White claims he cut taxes and improved the lives of people in the city of Houston. The reality, however, is that the amount Houston residents paid in Taxes increased and that the poorest and most vulnerable Houstonians did not see their lives improve under White’s tenure as mayor of that city. In addition, Houston remains one of the most polluted cities in the nation.

“Is he claiming he made people’s lives better before or after the unemployment rate increased during his time as mayor,” asked Shami. “His claims fall short of the truth,” Shami said.

FACT CHECKING BILL WHITE’S WHITEWASH

WHITE CLAIMS: As Mayor of Houston, cut the tax rate 5 times

REALITY: Although the tax rate was cut, the amount people actually paid increased. [HOUSTON CHRONICLE]

REALITY: White has previously denied playing a role in the tax cut:

“Ultimately, there will be some people whose taxes go up and some people whose taxes go down, because of the actions of the appraisal district, not the city,” Mayor Bill White said. [HOUSTON CHRONICLE]

WHITE CLAIMS: He improved lives of families in Houston

REALITY: During Bill White’s tenure as Mayor of Houston, the percentage of the population living in poverty remained relatively the same; it didn’t decrease:
Houston’s poverty rate last year was 20.7 percent, the bureau said, statistically unchanged from 2006. For children, the poverty rate last year was 3.13 percent, also unchanged from the previous year. [HOUSTON CHRONICLE]

REALITY:
The unemployment rate and number of unemployed in Harris County higher when he left office than when he entered office.

Unemployment in the greater Houston area increased by nearly 42,000 people during the mayor’s tenure. Harris County’s unemployment rate went from 6.8 percent in January of 2004 when White took office to 8.3 percent when he left office in December of 2009.

REALITY: While Bill White talks about how he worked to clean up Houston, the city was ranked in 2009 as one of Forbes Magazine’s “Most Toxic Cities.” Every ranking on pollution levels has Houston in the top 5 cities in the country.

REALITY: One of four children in Harris County live at or below the poverty level. [HOUSTON CHRONICLE; 6/10/09]

Pol. Adv. by the Farouk for Governor Campaign | 2500 West Loop South #300 | Houston | TX | 77027

Sphere: Related Content

American Theocracy Divorces The US Constitution, Promotes Terrorism

Posted by bosskitty

Why are there two Americas?  Why is it becoming an obsession to  become the same Theocratic state that we demean in other countries?  Guess what part of the US Constitution is trashed … the part about no state endorsed religion!

What Does The Constitution say about religion? (It may not be what you think.)

By Oliver “Buzz” Thomas

Ask most Americans what the Constitution says about God, and their answers may surprise you.

“One nation under God?”

Nope, that’s the Pledge of Allegiance.

“Oh, yeah, right, right. How about, ‘Endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights’?”

Sorry, but that’s the Declaration of Independence.

“Hmmmm.”

Mostly what you’ll get is a lot of blank stares. Trust me. I’ve tried it in nearly 50 states. Fully 55% of the country, according to a recent survey by the First Amendment Center, believes that the U.S. Constitution establishes us as a “Christian nation.” Worse still, while nearly all Americans say freedom of religion is important, only 56% think it should apply to all religious groups. The truth is that the Constitution says nothing about God. Not one word. And, you can bet that some of the local clergy back in the 1780s howled about it. Newspapers, pamphlets and sermons decried the drafters’ failure to acknowledge God.

One, and only one, reference

Even more interesting is what the Constitution has to say about religion. Although many of the nation’s loudest religionists continue to assert that America is a Christian nation in some legal or constitutional sense, the language of the original Constitution itself suggests otherwise. The only reference to religion is tucked away in Article VI and reads: “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t sound like a Christian nation to me. If you wished to create a Christian nation, wouldn’t you at least need to ensure that its leaders were Christian? The No Religious Test Clause stands out because most colonies did have religious qualifications for public office. Many required a belief in the Christian doctrine of the Trinity with some, like the Carolinas, going so far as to require that all elected officials be Protestant.

So, why would the framers of our Constitution do such a thing, and moreover, why two years later would they adopt a constitutional amendment declaring that the new federal government could “make no law respecting an establishment of religion?” Was it because they were militant atheists? Hardly. James Madison, the primary architect of our Constitution, studied under the tutelage of Presbyterian-preacher-turned-Princeton-president John Witherspoon and even considered a career in the ministry before opting for politics.

More likely, the framers were concerned about the corrupting influence the institutions of church and state have on each other when either becomes too cozy. These guys knew their history. They had witnessed the blood shed by governments in the name of religion. Europe was nearly destroyed by it. They also knew their politics. The Baptists, Presbyterians and other Evangelicals were fed up with religion that was “established” by the state (as was the Anglican Church in many Southern colonies and the Congregational Church in New England) and were determined to achieve full-throttle religious freedom for all — believers and non-believers alike. [Read it all including the comments]

Why then do some Americans insist on making this country, founded with secular intent, a Theocracy?  Because it is easy to manipulate, many non-cosmopolitan, religious people into electing politicians who pump their good vs evil beliefs.  OK, I said non-cosmopolitan because, rural areas are less exposed to the realities of a diverse population.  Their understanding of diversity is based on hearsay and exaggeration by biased charismatics.  Look at some of the acid comments recently made about the Haiti victims by TV Evangelist bankers.  Look at some of the nasty comments made about the Tsunami victims several years ago.  The “Christian” venom spewed is no worse than what some radical Muslim clerics spewed about September 11, 2001.   So Christian radicals are competeing for the lowest of low and deceiving America’s Laws by proselytizing on government issued weapons!  How dare they!  America’s secular Constitution made America a Democracy, not a Theocracy!

U.S. military rules prohibit any service member from proselytizing while serving in Iraq or Afghanistan, which are primarily Muslim nations.

US-made rifles inscribed with Bible codes are being used by US forces and Afghans to fight the Taliban.  The weapons come from Trijicon, a manufacturer based in Wixom, Michigan, that supplies the US military. The company’s now deceased founder, Glyn Bandon, started the practice which continues today.  David Chater, Al Jazeera’s correspondent in the Afghan capital Kabul, said: “It is a rallying cry for the Taliban. It gives them a propaganda tool.  “They’ve always tried to paint the US efforts in Afghanistan as a Christian campaign”.

So, it looks like America is throwing off it’s secular cloak and choosing to behave like Iran: Who rules Iran? Are you kidding? Unless you’ve been on another planet for the past 30 years, everybody knows that it’s the radical Islamist clerics who rule Iran. And they dominate with an iron fist. The post of president is largely ceremonial. All of the candidates in this week’s election were hand picked by the mullahs.

And Malaysia: Religious tension is rising in Malaysia over the Christian community’s use of the Arabic word ‘Allah’ for its own god.

America wants to be ruled by TV Evangelist Bankers who are always holier than everyone else until they’re caught!  This is where Religion has buddied up with weapons manufacturers  to promote killing in the name of Jesus.  Lets make our Christian warriors feel better about killing people with other belief systems, even though they may share their foxhole with Muslims, Jews , Buddhists or Agnostics!

Sphere: Related Content

Why Five Members Of SCOTUS Are Nuttier Than Fruit Cakes !!

Posted by nytexan

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

In the worst decision since Bush v Gore, the US Supreme Court has worked a ‘miracle’. Five ‘justices’ –John G. Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Antony Kennedy –have conspired to turn mere words on paper into living, breathing ‘human beings’ and have decreed that these corporations, mere ‘legal abstractions’, have the same rights of free speech as do living breathing human beings. Who is the ‘conspiracy theorist’, who is nuttiest when five ideologues in robes can dictate to you that you treat mere ‘abstractions’ –pieces of paper –as if they were people?

The crooks on K-street may resume their on-going auction of the United States knowing that their nefarious bargains have been blessed by the ‘high court’, a cult of weird robed people who believe weird things! ‘Corporations’ –mere abstractions –are given license to sell out the nation and call it ‘free speech’!

Should you dare to use the term ‘conspiracy’ to describe the activities of these crooks on K-street –the lobbies for Israel and other foreign entities –you will be labeled a ‘conspiracy theorist’! But SCOTUS, meanwhile, gets away with calling words on paper a ‘person’ and giving them rights! I ask you: who is nuttier? You for believing what volumes of federal laws have called ‘conspiracies’? Or –the SUPREME court who believes an embossed piece of paper with a corporate seal from Delaware on it is a real, living breathing person? I will tell you what I think! I think that five members of the Supreme Court of the United States are nuttier than fruit cakes!

Conspiracies Exist: SCOTUS IS One!
The Supreme Court itself has said ‘conspiracies eixst’ in numerous decisions that you can look up for yourself at Findlaw or Cornell University Law Library online. When there are thousands of pages of case law having to do with conspiracies, the notion that they don’t exist is just plain stupid! The only folk trying to discount ‘conspiracies’ are ring wing nuts who are clearly up to their necks in numerous treasonous conspiracies to undermine American democracy and wage wars of naked aggression and oil plunder! The latest SCOTUS decision is the result and the proof of my charge.

Certain types of conspiracies were made ‘legal’ long ago. They are called ‘corporations’ and ‘geniuses’ on the high court think that they are ‘real folk’ and treat them accordingly. In fact, corporations are just ink on paper! If that! Today –you can form a corporation online and save the ink! The Supreme Court will think you are ‘real’ and may even grant you privileges that you have not earned or deserve. If you can sell it, you might even enlist the US military for a little invasion and resource theft! You could line your pockets with the sacrifice of American lives and the lives of your victims.

SCOTUS has said that those ‘conspiracies of rich men’ are people –living, breathing people –who have rights and among those presumably inalienable rights is the right to bribe office seekers with monies that have most certainly bilked out of you and millions of other people, real people with hearts, lungs, mouths, and opinions. In an absurd Kafkaesque world of GOP manufacture, mere ink and paper have more rights, more power, more clout more impact upon the world than do you, a real person in a real word!

Less than two years after Buckley, Bellotti re-affirmed the First Amendment principle that the Government lacks the power to restrict political speech based on the speaker’s corporate identity. 435 U.S., at 784–785. Thus the law stood until Austin up-held a corporate independent expenditure restriction, bypassing Buckley and Bellotti by recognizing a new governmental interest inpreventing “the corrosive and distorting effects of immense aggrega-tions of [corporate] wealth . . . that have little or no correlation to thepublic’s support for the corporation’s political ideas.” 494 U. S., at 660. Pp. 25–32. (c

This Court is confronted with conflicting lines of precedent: a pre-Austin line forbidding speech restrictions based on the speaker’s corporate identity and a post-Austin line permitting them. Neither Austin’s antidistortion rationale nor the Government’s other justifica-tions support §441b’s restrictions. Pp. 32–47.–SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, No. 08–205.

Nevertheless, when a ‘conspiracy of rich men’ has been granted privilege and status, you will be told that ‘conspiracies’ do not exist! If that were so, why has the US Supreme Court handed down so many cases defining them and applying to them the laws of these United States? And why are there so many US laws having to do with ‘conspiracies’ if ‘conspiracies’ did not exist?The fascist domination of American life and debate is possible because people have ‘bought into’ the pernicious notion of ‘corporate personhood’. This notion facilitates More’s ‘conspiracy of rich men’.

Mere legal abstractions are absurdly accorded rights that, by right, belong only to real, living, flesh and blood people. Corporations are given license to lie about misdeeds, incompetence and corporate criminality, literally, a ‘conspiracy of rich men: the Tea Baggers and idiots who have bought into it; and the GOP consultants, firms, and focus groups who dreamed it all up. And, just a egregious, the Supreme Court itself where the majority fussed about a red herring: corporations losing a voice in the political process! The words ‘censorship’ and ‘banned speech’ was banded about as if they were truly concerned about it but would not be if it had not been their corporate sponsors who were clearly most affected.

Is the Voice of ‘Labor’ Silenced?
One can only conclude that SCOTUS’s problem with the law as it had been was that labor unions were on an equal footing with the big, conservative corporations! Before the Supreme Court itself subverted Federal Election laws, both corporations and labor unions were free to voice any political opinion about any issue or candidate whenever they wanted! We can’t have that, now can we? Simply, the five right wing extremists on the court have, as they did with Bush v Gore, labored mightily to hatch a rationalization for lies and bulshit, a rationalization that sounds scholarly, legal and erudite but which is, in fact, a lod of codswallop and  highfalutin’ sounding crap!!


I can perceive nothing but a certain conspiracy of rich men procuring their own commodities under the name and title of the commonwealth.They invent and devise all means and crafts, first how to keep safely, without fear of losing, that they have unjustly gathered together, and next how to hire and abuse the work and labour of the poor for as little money as may be. These devices, when the rich men have decreed to be kept and observed for the commonwealth’s sake, that is to say for the wealth also of the poor people, then they be made laws.But these most wicked and vicious men, when they have by their insatiable covetousness divided among themselves all those things, which would have sufficed all men, yet how far be they from the wealth and felicity of the Utopian commonwealth? Out of the which, in that all the desire of money with the use of thereof is utterly secluded and banished, how great a heap of cares is cut away! How great an occasion of wickedness and mischief is plucked up by the roots!

–Sir Thomas More (1478–1535), Utopia, Of the Religions in Utopia

Who is SCOTUS protecting and favoring? The Carvellian quick response: the richest one percent of the US population which, in fact, owns more than some 95 percent of the rest of us combined. The Supreme Court of the Unites States, infiltrated by the likes of Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and The US right wing have robbed the US population with “trickle down theory” and other nonsense utterly unsupported with fact or evidence. Here are some assorted facts that paint the ugly picture.

  • In the late 1970s, the top one percent of the US population held 13 percent of the wealth; in 1995 it held 38 percent. [Source: Source: Levy, Frank. The New Dollars and Dreams ].
  • The top ten percent of the US population owns 81.8 percent of the real estate, 81.2 percent of the stock, and 88 percent of the bonds. [Source: Federal Reserve Bank data in Left Business Observer, No. 72, Apr. 3, 1996, p. 5].
  • One percent of the US population owns sixty percent of the stock and forty percent of the total wealth. [Source: Hawken, Paul, The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of Sustainability. New York: Harper Business, 1993].
  • The top fifth of households saw their income rise 43 percent between 1977 and 1999, while the bottom fifth saw their income fall 9 percent….
  • Since 1973, every group in society except the top 20 percent has seen its share of the national income decline, with the bottom 20 percent losing the most. They have just 3.6 percent of national income, down from 4.4 percent a quarter century ago.
  • Indeed, the top fifth now makes more than the rest of the nation combined…
  • Rebecca Blank, who recently left the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, pointed out, ‘We’ve gone back to levels of income and wealth inequality that this country hasn’t seen since the teens and 1920s.’” [Source: Merrill Goozner, Crash of '99?, Salon.com, Oct. 1, 1999; addendum: since 1999, the date the source was published, the situation is much, much worse. Today --just ONE PERCENT own more than 95 percent of the rest of us combined. GOP incompetence and criminality moves so fast these days, it's hard to keep up!].
  • The top one percent of Americans receive more income than the bottom 40 percent. [Source: Korten, David. When Corporations Rule the World, p. 108].
  • Federal Reserve median family net worth by percentile for 1992, 1995, 1998, 2001 (Federal Reserve Bulletin January 2003, pp. 1-36). Note the small gains for the bottom 75% of the population and larger gains for the upper 25% and that the 1998 to 2001 gains were largest.
  • --US Wealth Distributions 1989-2001

Republicans bought the scam because it made them feel good about being greedy, shallow bastards. The appeal is obvious: trickle down rationalized greed but only after the fact; it made one feel good about one’s worst impulses, motives, and elitist bigotry.


Sphere: Related Content

How China Partnered with the GOP to Screw America

Posted by nytexan

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

Chinese rulers and the US elites partnered to enslave US workers and consumers. As a result, the US became a vassal state of China, a huge population which props up the buck so that it can sell us junk via Wal-Mart.

These deals were all worked out with China by Bush Sr et al in the years following Nixon’s infamous visit to the forbidden city. In these talks, US leaders, primarily the right wing/GOP, the US consumer and laborer was sold out. The US would become a vassal state, a slave state, a consumer society whose raison d’etre was to buy Chinese junk. The big losers are US workers and consumers.

  • I work at Wal-Mart (I’m involved in the UFCW’s effort to organize W-M). One day, right after I was hired, I went around on my lunch break and just sort of randomly looked at where a whole bunch of products were made.
  • I think I found a blender that had been made in Malaysia. EVERYTHING else had been made in China.
  • I wonder how the typical US consumer would feel about Wal-Mart if it were named, say, US Corporate Capital & Chinese Slave Labor Coooperative? –John Carter, on Facebook

The US used to make some of the products –appliances, electronic gear et al –that are now dumped on the US via an economic blight called Wal-Mart! The US ruling elite resented the high wages paid to unionized workers in affluent America. Nixon, Reagan et al solved the US labor ‘problem’!

The solution: EXPORT US JOBS TO CHINA!

China pays slave wages and dumps the resulting cheap product on a US which produces very little these days. Concurrently, there are fewer futures, fewer opportunities, declining hope, rising despair –all the result of some thirty or forty years of right wing bullshit, lies, crookery and outright fraud. The GOP, for example, is not a political party. It is a crime syndicate and a kooky cult to boot!

The tragic truth can be found in black and white at the CIA’s World Fact Book which lists the US at the bottom of the list with the world’s largest negative current account balance, formerly called the balance of trade deficit.

While the US was spending time, resources and personnel in running ‘elections’ for its corrupt clients in Afghanistan and Iraq, and participating in pointless mediations between its intransigent Israeli partner and its impotent Palestinian client, the South Korean government backed a consortium headed by the Korea Electric Power Corporation in its successful bid on the $20.4 billion dollar nuclear power deal, opening the way for other billion-dollar contracts in the region (FT – page 13)….In contrast, the US is a declining world power with a deteriorating society resulting from its military-driven empire building and its financial-speculative centered economy:

  1. Washington pursues minor military clients in Asia; while China expands its trading and investment agreements with major economic partners – Russia, Japan, South Korea and elsewhere.Washington drains the domestic economy to finance overseas wars. China extracts minerals and energy resources to create its domestic job market in manufacturing.
  2. The US invests in military technology to target local insurgents challenging US client regimes; China invests in civilian technology to create competitive exports.
  3. China begins to restructure its economy toward developing the country’s interior and allocates greater social spending to redress its gross imbalances and inequalities while the US rescues and reinforces the parasitical financial sector, which plundered industries (strips assets via mergers and acquisitions) and speculates on financial objectives with no impact on employment, productivity or competitiveness.
  4. The US multiplies wars and troop build-ups in the Middle East, South Asia, the Horn of Africa and Caribbean; China provides investments and loans of over $25 billion dollars in building infrastructure, mineral extraction, energy production and assembly plants in Africa.
  5. China signs multi-billion dollar trade and investment agreements with Iran, Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Peru and Bolivia, securing access to strategic energy, mineral and agricultural resources; Washington provides $6 billion in military aid to Colombia, secures seven military bases from President Uribe (to threaten Venezuela), backs a military coup in tiny Honduras and denounces Brazil and Bolivia for diversifying its economic ties with Iran.
  6. China increases economic relations with dynamic Latin American economies, incorporating over 80% of the continent’s population; the US partners with the failed state of Mexico, which has the worst economic performance in the hemisphere and where powerful drug cartels control wide regions and penetrate deep into the state apparatus.

Information Clearing House, The US and China: One Side is Losing, the Other is Winning, James Petras

The US right wing robbed the US population with “trickle down theory” and other nonsense utterly unsupported with fact or evidence:

  • In the late 1970s, the top one percent of the US population held 13 percent of the wealth; in 1995 it held 38 percent. [Source: Source: Levy, Frank. The New Dollars and Dreams ].
  • The top ten percent of the US population owns 81.8 percent of the real estate, 81.2 percent of the stock, and 88 percent of the bonds. [Source: Federal Reserve Bank data in Left Business Observer, No. 72, Apr. 3, 1996, p. 5].
  • One percent of the US population owns sixty percent of the stock and forty percent of the total wealth. [Source: Hawken, Paul, The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of Sustainability. New York: Harper Business, 1993].
  • The top fifth of households saw their income rise 43 percent between 1977 and 1999, while the bottom fifth saw their income fall 9 percent….
  • Since 1973, every group in society except the top 20 percent has seen its share of the national income decline, with the bottom 20 percent losing the most. They have just 3.6 percent of national income, down from 4.4 percent a quarter century ago.
  • Indeed, the top fifth now makes more than the rest of the nation combined…
    Rebecca Blank, who recently left the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, pointed out, ‘We’ve gone back to levels of income and wealth inequality that this country hasn’t seen since the teens and 1920s.’” [Source: Merrill Goozner, Crash of '99?, Salon.com, Oct. 1, 1999; addendum: since 1999, the date the source was published, the situation is much, much worse. Today --just ONE PERCENT own more than 95 percent of the rest of us combined. GOP incompetence and criminality moves so fast these days, it's hard to keep up!].
  • The top one percent of Americans receive more income than the bottom 40 percent. [Source: Korten, David. When Corporations Rule the World, p. 108].
  • Federal Reserve median family net worth by percentile for 1992, 1995, 1998, 2001 (Federal Reserve Bulletin January 2003, pp. 1-36). Note the small gains for the bottom 75% of the population and larger gains for the upper 25% and that the 1998 to 2001 gains were largest.--US Wealth Distributions 1989-2001

Republicans bought the scam because it made them feel good about being greedy, shallow bastards. The appeal is obvious: trickle down rationalized greed but only after the fact; it made one feel good about one’s worst impulses, motives, and elitist bigotry.

Sphere: Related Content

Texas Progressive Alliance Weekly Round Up Jan 4, 2010

Posted by nytexan

The Texas Progressive Alliance is still somewhat amazed to be living in the year we make contact, and we hope we’re all still going strong when Odyssey Three rolls around.

Texas has most drilling, worst regulation. Texas made national news this week in the ProPublica investigative report and they used pictures provided by TXsharon at Bluedaze: DRILLING REFORM FOR TEXAS.

WhosPlayin reports that the local city council is once again considering the question of whether to participate in 287(g) and force its vendors to use E-Verify to check for work eligibility.

BossKitty at TruthHugger found a poignant editorial on Al Jazeera: Weary Soldiers At Risk, They Know This - Why do foreign correspondents have more in depth observations than America’s own Corporate media who follows the money and toes the line for sponsors political perks that promise ’scoops’.

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme thinks all kids should be given free, nutritious school meals. Just do it.

WCNews at Eye On Williamson discusses another worthless GOP plan for transportation in Texas, Kay’s transportation plan is a clunker.

The Texas Cloverleaf questions whether or not a Houston City Councilman-elect knows the difference between a campaign website and city resources.

Off the Kuff called out some political gamesmanship over the murder rate in Harris County.

Last week Teddy reviewed the best of the Left of College Station, and looks at the year ahead at Left of College Station. This week Left of College Station will begin coverage of the 2010 campaign season in the Brazos Valley, and report on human trafficking in Houston.

Candidate filings, including Gordon Quan for Harris County Judge and a list of the statewides, appears in PDiddie’s post at Brains and Eggs.

Bay Area Houston hopes the next decade will be better than the last.

Justin at Asian American Action Fund Blog covered Gordon Quan’s campaign kickoff including full video of Quan’s speech.

Libby Shaw puts together the latest throw downs exposing GOP hypocrisy and lies. Check it out : Rachel Maddow Busts Republicans for Cowardice, Hypocrisy and Lies.

At McBlogger, Mayor McSleaze noted with some interest that Marc Katz filed for Lt. Governor. Some, but not much. More important to him was a really nasty prairie dog attack.

Neil at Texas Liberal selected his wife as person of the decade and named his blog—Texas Liberal— as blog of the decade.

tpaheader_1

Sphere: Related Content

Weary Soldiers At Risk, They Know This

Posted by bosskitty

A poignant editorial on Al Jazeera seems to have more in depth observations than America’s Corporate media.  Mainstream media must follow the money, toe the line for sponsors and political perks that promise ’scoops’.

‘The US military is exhausted”

By Sarah Lazare

The call for over 30,000 more troops to be sent to Afghanistan is a travesty for the people of that country who have already suffered eight brutal years of occupation.

A photograph with a message – and without a hope

A photograph with a message – and without a hope

It is also a harsh blow to the US soldiers facing imminent deployment.

As Barack Obama, the US president, gears up for a further escalation that will bring the total number of troops in Afghanistan to over 100,000, he faces a military force that has been exhausted and overextended by fighting two wars.

Many from within the ranks are openly declaring that they have had enough, allying with anti-war veterans and activists in calling for an end to the US-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, with some active duty soldiers publicly refusing to deploy.

The architects of this war would be well-advised to listen to the concerns of the soldiers and veterans tasked with carrying out their war policies on the ground.

Many of those being deployed have already faced multiple deployments to combat zones: the 101st Airborne Division, which will be deployed to Afghanistan in early 2010, faces its fifth combat tour since 2002.

“They are just going to start moving the soldiers who already served in Iraq to Afghanistan, just like they shifted me from one war to the next,” said Eddie Falcon, a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW), who served in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Soldiers are going to start coming back with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), missing limbs, problems with alcohol, and depression.”

Many of these troops are still suffering the mental and physical fallout from previous deployments.

Fort Campbell tries to address the consequences of exhausted soldiers.

As far back as 1919, exhausted warriors suffer numerous medical complications.

Symptoms Of Hyperthyroidism Observed In Exhausted Soldiers, by W. Johnson © 1919 BMJ Publishing Group.

McClatchy has a blog dedicated to the perils facing “Wounded Warriors” a collection of veterans coverage from the McClatchy Washington Bureau, McClatchy Newspapers, and other sources

As far back as 2004, MSNBC recognized and warned about some of the consequences facing returning troops:

1 in 8 returning soldiers suffers from PTSD – But less than half with problems seek help, report finds

‘The most important thing we can do for service members who have been in combat is to help them understand that the earlier that they get help when they need it, the better off they’ll be.’
— Dr. Charles W. Hoge, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

The Psychology Of Healing For Returning Soldiers And Their Families

Coping with the aftermath of war is challenging for returning soldiers and their families. Psychologists offered ways for individuals and their families to handle post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health problems that may arise.

Returning Soldiers Project – The United States is in the midst of a military conflict in Iraq that has involved thousands of men and women in the armed forces of this nation. These men and women are not only regular service people, but also reserves whose necessary service disrupts their lives in a variety of ways.

Regardless of active duty or reserve status, soldiers are returning from Iraq or Afghanistan, from combat to civilian life to peace time. This return can happen in as little as 48 hours with

contemporary transportation capabilities. Surely that return brings with it a host of issues related to reunion with one’s family, friends, and colleagues. There may be physical issues related to injury and rehabilitation. There may be psychological dimensions of that return that are difficult to navigate. And there may be spiritual and religious dimensions to that return that must be addressed by the individual soldier.

In addition to the issues that an individual soldier might face upon a return from combat, there are the family and friends who may experience a range of emotions upon the return of their familymember or friend.
About the Returning Soldiers Project

The Returning Soldiers Project is a collaborative effort among Villanova faculty and staff members to address an important series of questions:

  • What obligation does society have to assist the returning soldier, his or her family, and his or her friends, in the transition from war to peace?
  • How ought society respond to the soldier’s need for healing, physical, psychological, and/or spiritual?
  • Indeed, how ought society help to facilitate any forgiveness that a soldier needs, both from him- or herself, his family and friends, and the society that sent him or her to war?

Walter Reed Army Medical CenterReturning Wounded Warriors

TruthHugger has often complained about the inadequate medical support system receiving troops and especially support contractors returning from hostile areas.  Whether its Bosnia, Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Africa or any of those secret places the American Public is not authorized to know about, the system has a great facade but little follow through.  The bureaucratic obstacle course is almost as traumatic as the environment that caused casualties in the first place.  The physically and mentally harmed are damaged again and again then returned to a socially unprepared, uneducated and inadequate environment.  Accountability is spotty and easily denied by a government that addresses the issue as an afterthought.  Playing catch up, the US Government scrambles to clean up its negligent, short sighted support system.  The best attention is being provided at smaller levels like specific military bases, specific veterans associations and non-profit agencies.  But, the largest institution that falls short is still the same one that puts it’s human capital into dangerous and traumatic environments.

Returning from one traumatic environment to another can be a knock out blow to many returning people.  There should be no distinction between US Military and US Support Contractors, whether you like them or not.  These returnees are expected to incorporate back into, what America calls, a stable, productive and civilized society. Then, they are expected to resume whatever life they left behind. Move along.  Forget about it, don’t talk about it, unless your social circle was  with you in the trenches, your family and friends cannot relate to your experiences or your dreams.  They cannot see your dreams.  They don’t understand you are seeing them much differently than you did before you went on a violent adventure.

The worst insult for returning warriors and support contractors is the misunderstanding of their problems.  America’s focus fixates on the monetary expense first and the human expense second.  Mental issues caused by repeated psychological trauma is something Americans cannot deal with unless they work in the medical field.  Medical expenses must be factored in when calculating war funding instead of manufacturing new destructive toys to profit generals and senators.  After all, bringing industry to your constituency is so patriotic … and profitable.

Returning to America is as traumatic as leaving it.  Culture shock.  It does not have to be that way.  Weary soldiers must be helped by allowing them to recover before expecting them to incorporate back into society.  The consequences; they remain broken, traumatized and hazardous. Hazardous?  Yes, the collateral damage to families sending their loved ones into harms way, then receiving a changed person back is very disruptive and can spread the toll of psychological trauma.

cross posted from TruthHugger

Sphere: Related Content

Demand that Obama End Bush’s Policies and War Crimes

Posted by nytexan

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

I did not support Obama so that the US could continue Bush’s criminal policies! I most certainly did not and do not support the commission of new war crimes, aggression, or atrocities!

  • US President Barack Obama personally issued the order for US air strikes in Yemen last Thursday which killed scores of civilians, including women and children.
  • US warplanes used cruise missiles against alleged Al Qaeda camps in the Abyan village of al Maajala, some 480 kilometers southeast of the capital Sana’a, and in the Arhab district, 60 kilometers to the northeast of Sana’a. The US strikes were apparently coordinated with the US-backed dictatorship of Yemen President Ali Abdallah Saleh, whose military forces attacked the bombed towns as well as a third village, resulting in the deaths of some 120 people, according to Yemen opposition spokesmen.
  • Local officials and witnesses in the area of Mahsad, the site of the heaviest US bombardment, put the number of those killed at more than 60 and said the dead were mostly civilians. They denied that the target was an al Qaeda stronghold.

Obama ordered US air strikes on Yemen By Barry Grey

When one’s own country is wrong, it is one’s patriotic duty to protest. I had hoped Obama would not become the new LBJ –stuck with and blamed for GOP wars of aggression accompanied by heinous war crimes by the US military and the world’s largest and best financed terrorist organization –THE CIA! [See: Kangas, A Timeline of CIA Atrocities]

Three of the seven–George Tenet, Porter Goss, and Michael Hayden–were themselves involved, in one way or another, in planning, conducting, or covering up all manner of illegal actions, including torture, assassination, and illegal eavesdropping. In this light, the most transparent part of the letter may be the sentence in which they worry: “There is no reason to expect that the re-opened criminal investigation will remain narrowly focused.

“When asked about the letter on the Sunday TV talk shows on Sept. 20, Obama was careful always to respond first by expressing obligatory “respect” for the CIA and its directors. With Bob Schieffer on Face the Nation, though, Obama did allow himself a condescending quip. He commented, “I appreciate the former CIA directors wanting to look out for an institution that they helped to build.

“That quip was, sadly, the exception to the rule. While Obama keeps repeating the mantra that “nobody is above the law,” there is no real sign that he intends to face down Panetta and the Seven Dwarfs–no sign that anyone has breathed new life into federal prosecutor John Durham, to whom Holder gave the mandate for further “preliminary investigation.” What is generally forgotten is that it was former Attorney General Michael Mukasey who picked Durham two years ago to investigate CIA’s destruction of 91 tapes of the interrogation of “high-value detainees.”

Are Presidents Afraid of the CIA?

US ‘Presidents’ have reason to be afraid of the CIA. The last President to threaten the CIA with being smashed ‘into a thousand pieces’ was JFK. He was murdered in downtown Dallas and a ‘lone scapegoat’ had been set up to take the fall.

Without a bullet that can be proven to have been at the scene of the crime, the government would have had no case against Lee Harvey Oswald, tried in abstention in the media because he was murdered and murdered before he could talk. Conveniently! The government needed a piece of hard evidence –a magic bullet’!

They got one! Conveniently!

The government needed a truly magical bullet that did magical things –the work of six or seven other bullets most which got beat up and deformed in the line of duty.Arlen Specter must be credited with concocting the theory that a single ‘magical’ bullet could smash bone and cartilage and emerge with nary a scratch!

Arlen Specter would pull a pull a ‘magical theory’ out of thin air while a friendly shill would pull an equally ‘magic bullet’ out of his ass.The government had a problem! Lee Harvey Oswald would have to be tried for the crime of murdering the President. For quite some time in our history, those charged with crimes were given trials.

The government had not yet figured out that if you just call them a bad name (terrorist) you can dispense with all those niceties. Someone, somewhere was alarmed! What if Lee Harvey Oswald should get a good lawyer and mount a strong defense! What if Lee Harvey Oswald proved his charge that he was just a patsy!

Why Lee Harvey Oswald Had to Die!

As things ‘went down’, the government was left with a live patsy against whom it could NOT have made a case. There was a bullet –a ‘magic’ bullet –that would have been thrown out of court for lacking ‘bona fides’. The fall guy had to die!

Like the fatal flaws in the official conspiracy theory of 911, the holes in the government’s JFK story are fatal.

  • No competent or sane sniper/hit man would choose to shoot anyone from the TSBD. The ‘view to a kill’ was obscured by branches and leaves as photos taken that day prove! It was and remains the worst of several possible locations!
  • Zapruder frame 313 proves conclusively that the fatal shot came from the front, the so-called Grassy Knoll
  • No sniper in his right mind would choose a kill spot providing no possibility of egress or escape! Oswald would have had to have ditched his rifle and run down some six flights! No ‘hit man’ would have tried it! It’s stupid! The place would have been ’sealed’!
  • I have visited Dealy Plaza! The picket fence afforded cover, egress and a clear unobstructed shot of the ‘target’ from a distance about one third that of a site in TSBD.
  • From TSBD, the motorcade is moving laterally and then away; from the picket fence, the target’s lateral motion relative to the ’shooter’ is minimal. A non-expert could have made the shot but, in fact, it was an expert who did!

I interviewed a witness to the JFK murder many years after the fact. Rosemary Willis was but a child on that fateful day and her story has been ignored by the mainstream media. When we met, she produced several boxes of color slides that had been taken by her father –Phillip Willis –that fateful day in Dealy Plaza.

Exposing Lies About the FED, the CIA, the Murder of JFK

The story of these slides is a complicated one. The bottom line is this: the slides were tampered with while in the possession of the FBI. Before the slides were seized by the FBI, Look Magazine published one of the slides on a double-page spread. During my interview with Rosemary Willis, I compared the slides with a double-page spread that had run in Look Magazine before the slides were taken.

Over a double-page spread in Look Magazine, a train on the railroad tracks is clearly visible beyond the infamous pergola atop the grassy knoll. But –in the slides that were returned by the FBI, there are no train cars to be seen!

The railroad tracks figure prominently in the assassination. It was amid freight cars on those same tracks that several ‘tramps’ –dead ringers for Jeb MaGruder, Frank Sturgis and Howard Hunt –had been arrested before the assassination.

Only the FBI had possession of the slides and only the FBI could have removed the train from the photos! And only the FBI might have had motive to do so! And what was it the FBI hoped to conceal? Simply, the tramps had not been tramps at all but assassins having connections to the CIA. The slides slipped through the cracks just long enough to have been published by Look. The ‘train’ was not intended to be seen. Otherwise, why would the FBI have removed the train from the slides? The FBI would not have bothered to tamper with slides that did not incriminate them in some way. A train and box cars are incriminating if and only if they were of some use to the assassins of JFK.

“I didn’t have anything to do with the assassination, didn’t know anything about it,” he said during one of them. “I did my time for Watergate. I shouldn’t have to do additional time and suffer additional losses for something I had nothing to do with.”But now, in August 2003, propped up in his sickbed, paper on his lap, pen in hand and son sitting next to him, he began to write down the names of men who had indeed participated in a plot to kill the president. He had lied during those two federal investigations. He knew something after all. He told St. John about his own involvement, too. It was explosive stuff, with the potential to reconfigure the JFK-assassination-theory landscape. And then he got better and went on to live for four more years.

–ERIK HEDEGAARD, The Last Confessions of E. Howard Hunt, Rolling Stone

Those assassins, I believe, were supervised that day by E. Howard Hunt assisted by George H.W. Bush who was photographed hanging around the front entrance of the TSBD, perhaps making sure that his ‘men’ were in their places, awaiting their cues. ‘All the world’s a stage’!

Later this man’s near moronic son would preside over traumas perhaps equal to an assassination of a legitimate and duly elected President. Bush Jr would become complicit in a stolen US election and the felonious attack upon ballot re-counters in the ‘banana republic’ of Florida, controlled by yet another Bush, Florida Governor Jeb Bush, who signed Executive Order 01-261 on September 7, 2001 just four days before the WTC tragedy of 911. J. Bush’s order paved the way for a declaration of martial law in the state of Florida, delegating to ‘…the Adjutant General of the state of Florida all necessary authority….to order members of the Florida National Guard into Active Service.’

“I hereby declare that a state of emergency exists in the state of Florida…The Authority to suspend the effect of any statute or rule governing the conduct of state business, and further authority to suspend the effect of any order or rule of any government entity…The authority to seize and utilize any and all real or personal property as needed to meet this emergency…The authority to order the evacuation of any or all persons from any location in the State…The authority to regulate the return of the evacuees to their home communities…I hereby order the Adjutant General to activate the Florida National Guard for the duration of this emergency.”–Florida Governor Jeb Bush, September 11, 2001

Sphere: Related Content

Good Riddance To Another Year From Hell

Posted by nytexan

We should have know that  the first decade of the new millennium was going to be a disaster. Our first clue was when the Supreme Court anointment Bush as our 43rd President. We all know how well that worked out for us!

  • The collapse of Enron
  • 9/11 attacks
  • Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
  • Blackwater
  • Patriot Act
  • Economic meltdown…..the worst since the great depression
  • Katrina and FEMA….. lets not forget Brownie
  • Highest unemployment in decades
  • Oil prices soar
  • Corporate bailouts; AIG, Auto industry to name a few
  • Scams, schemers and crooks: Bernie Madoff and Allen Stanford, Tom DeLay
  • Dow Jones closes it’s worst decade since 1930

People we could have lived without…just to name a few:

  • Dick Cheney and the Bush Cabinet
  • Karl Rove
  • Bill O’Reilly
  • Rush Limbaugh
  • Sarah Palin
  • Teabaggers
  • Birthers
  • Wingnuts
  • Christian right
  • Fox news…what a joke
  • Useless Congress both Republican and Democrat

The events of the last decade have forever changed America, Americans and how the world deals with us.

In case you forgot what fun we had, JibJab will help you remember.

Never a Year Like ‘09 – JibJab

JibJab 2008 Year in Review

JibJab 2007 Year in Review

JibJab 2006 Year in Review Nuckin’ Futs!

JibJab 2005 Year in Review

Sphere: Related Content

Custom Search

Recent Comments

TPA

Proud member of Texas Progressive Bloggers, a FeedBurner Network.

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Texas-Progressive-Bloggers
Powered by FeedBurner

RSS NPR

RSS Washington Post

RSS Marketwatch

RSS AlterNet

RSS IPS News

blogarama - the blog directory

BlogBurst.com

Xbox 360 Systems at Buy.com!

iPods at Buy.com!

counter hit xanga
Subscribe 304 feed subscribers

James Madison

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.

BlogBurst.com

Add to Technorati Favorites


blog advertising is good for you

Recent Posts

Archives

 

February 2010
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  

One Rule

I encourage comments from all sides. I will not edit any comments. They post as you have written them. However, your comments will be deleted for the following reason only: I will not tolerate racism on any level especially the use of the "N" word.

Allies

Blogroll


blog advertising is good for you

News Outlets

Vets

World

RSS TruthHugger

RSS Time:Top Stories

RSS BBC

RSS USA Today

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I have posted it here in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.