<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PUMA, Was It Ever About Hillary Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:05:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: herewegoagain</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-34601</link>
		<dc:creator>herewegoagain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-34601</guid>
		<description>Everytime I see responses written like most of the ones to this article, which appear to be written by white women, I think about the extraordinarily clueless and cruel white woman depicted in the COLOR PURPLE who was highly offended when Oprah&#039;s character didn&#039;t want her very young children working in a white woman&#039;s kitchen. I think there&#039;s a reason white folks get more cancer and age ten times faster than people of color. They seem to spew hate wherever they go. In their world, it&#039;s not possible to respect and like John McCain and not vote for him. Sarah Palin is another story. She seems to have risen from the ashes of white hate. I really don&#039;t understand what is wrong with white folks. Is it genetic? Is this why white folks tend to die disproportionately from skin cancer - you know from trying to TAN their skin? By the year 2040, white folks will be a minority in the United States. And I have to say I am so glad because they can&#039;t seem to tolerate differences. I&#039;m not mad at white folks and I definitely don&#039;t hate them but DAMN, they seem to be genetically engineered to hate. Our planet is dying. We need to move past all the hate and start working together to find solutions not only to save ourselves but each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everytime I see responses written like most of the ones to this article, which appear to be written by white women, I think about the extraordinarily clueless and cruel white woman depicted in the COLOR PURPLE who was highly offended when Oprah&#8217;s character didn&#8217;t want her very young children working in a white woman&#8217;s kitchen. I think there&#8217;s a reason white folks get more cancer and age ten times faster than people of color. They seem to spew hate wherever they go. In their world, it&#8217;s not possible to respect and like John McCain and not vote for him. Sarah Palin is another story. She seems to have risen from the ashes of white hate. I really don&#8217;t understand what is wrong with white folks. Is it genetic? Is this why white folks tend to die disproportionately from skin cancer &#8211; you know from trying to TAN their skin? By the year 2040, white folks will be a minority in the United States. And I have to say I am so glad because they can&#8217;t seem to tolerate differences. I&#8217;m not mad at white folks and I definitely don&#8217;t hate them but DAMN, they seem to be genetically engineered to hate. Our planet is dying. We need to move past all the hate and start working together to find solutions not only to save ourselves but each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p8prclip</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-32921</link>
		<dc:creator>p8prclip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-32921</guid>
		<description>I’m a Republican and I just want to thank all of you who see Obama for what he is. As much as I want our party to win I would have to concede the fact that a loss to Hillary would have been welcomed compared to the alternative. Keep the faith…Hilary will have hers in 4!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a Republican and I just want to thank all of you who see Obama for what he is. As much as I want our party to win I would have to concede the fact that a loss to Hillary would have been welcomed compared to the alternative. Keep the faith…Hilary will have hers in 4!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-32356</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-32356</guid>
		<description>Some of the bloggers above mentioned the idea that it may very well be Bristol and not Sarah Palin who gave birth to Trig.  There is A LOT of evidence that this is so.  I suggest you go to this site: www.palindeception.com to see this evidence.  Example: Bristol left school for 5 months prior to the birth of that baby.  Trig&#039;s birth announcement was on the hospital&#039;s web site, then disappeared.  How do we know for sure that Bristol is pregnant, let alone 5 months pregnant?  How could Sarah claim to be 7 months pregnant, when her staff, who saw her daily, never suspected?  Etc.  A lot of the info is medical, like, she could be pregnant again soon after giving birth, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the bloggers above mentioned the idea that it may very well be Bristol and not Sarah Palin who gave birth to Trig.  There is A LOT of evidence that this is so.  I suggest you go to this site: <a href="http://www.palindeception.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.palindeception.com</a> to see this evidence.  Example: Bristol left school for 5 months prior to the birth of that baby.  Trig&#8217;s birth announcement was on the hospital&#8217;s web site, then disappeared.  How do we know for sure that Bristol is pregnant, let alone 5 months pregnant?  How could Sarah claim to be 7 months pregnant, when her staff, who saw her daily, never suspected?  Etc.  A lot of the info is medical, like, she could be pregnant again soon after giving birth, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nytexan</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-32097</link>
		<dc:creator>nytexan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-32097</guid>
		<description>Betmo:
Agreed. 

Just like the GOP, PUMA&#039;s are not willing to look at facts about Palin. They seems to think that it&#039;s ok that Palin is facing possible impeachment if the abuse of powers is true. They don&#039;t seem to care that the bridge to nowhere was dead before she was sworn in as governor. Nor does it bother them that she never returned federal money, our taxpayer money. Nor does it bother the PUMA&#039;s that Palin is against everything Hillary Clinton stand for.   

I guess it should not bother them that Karl Rove and his protege Schmidt are running McCain&#039;s campaign. 

I am actually starting to believe that PUMA&#039;s are a Karl Rove group. The new swiftboaters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betmo:<br />
Agreed. </p>
<p>Just like the GOP, PUMA&#8217;s are not willing to look at facts about Palin. They seems to think that it&#8217;s ok that Palin is facing possible impeachment if the abuse of powers is true. They don&#8217;t seem to care that the bridge to nowhere was dead before she was sworn in as governor. Nor does it bother them that she never returned federal money, our taxpayer money. Nor does it bother the PUMA&#8217;s that Palin is against everything Hillary Clinton stand for.   </p>
<p>I guess it should not bother them that Karl Rove and his protege Schmidt are running McCain&#8217;s campaign. </p>
<p>I am actually starting to believe that PUMA&#8217;s are a Karl Rove group. The new swiftboaters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nytexan</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-32096</link>
		<dc:creator>nytexan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-32096</guid>
		<description>DealwithIt:
Education seems to have nothing to do with the amount of contempt that democrats voting for MCCain/Palin are showing. They will not even listen to the request of Hillary Clinton. As I stated in my post for theses people it was never about Hillary but their own agenda.  Their continue for Palin, who platform is opposed to them, shows that it was never about Hillary but about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DealwithIt:<br />
Education seems to have nothing to do with the amount of contempt that democrats voting for MCCain/Palin are showing. They will not even listen to the request of Hillary Clinton. As I stated in my post for theses people it was never about Hillary but their own agenda.  Their continue for Palin, who platform is opposed to them, shows that it was never about Hillary but about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nytexan</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-32094</link>
		<dc:creator>nytexan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-32094</guid>
		<description>Tammy Lynn:
It would help if you read my comment before you went on your tirade. I never mentioned Palin or Obama&#039;s experience nor did I elude to it. 

Addressing my point would have been more valuable than ranting about something that was not said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy Lynn:<br />
It would help if you read my comment before you went on your tirade. I never mentioned Palin or Obama&#8217;s experience nor did I elude to it. </p>
<p>Addressing my point would have been more valuable than ranting about something that was not said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betmo</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-32093</link>
		<dc:creator>betmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-32093</guid>
		<description>i am a woman- and as a woman, i fail to see how you could possibly vote for a mccain/palin ticket.  i did not support hillary clinton in the primaries- i am a dennis kucinich supporter- but i can say with sincerity that clinton&#039;s fight for women&#039;s and children&#039;s issues is polar opposite of mccain/palin.  sarah palin&#039;s record while in office- whether it be mayor or governor- has been all about sarah palin.  she has misused her office to advance her religion, her personal vendettas, and apparently, travel about on the taxpayer&#039;s dime- but damn! the woman can shoot.  

you pumas are a joke.  you can stand up and say that you supported hillary clinton all you want- i call you liars.  you cannot tell me with any degree of believability that you support women and children&#039;s issues or any issue that hillary clinton has broken the glass ceiling for.  if you were truly interested in championing women&#039;s issues- and advancing women&#039;s causes- you would vote for cynthia mckinney- she is actually running for PRESIDENT.  mccain is a misogynist- i mean he called his wife a cunt- nobody squawks about that.  that was only the occasion he got caught.  so, go ahead and try and distract from the real platforms and the real issues- you all were republican sympathizers from the get go.  let&#039;s lay it out in lavender and stop the lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am a woman- and as a woman, i fail to see how you could possibly vote for a mccain/palin ticket.  i did not support hillary clinton in the primaries- i am a dennis kucinich supporter- but i can say with sincerity that clinton&#8217;s fight for women&#8217;s and children&#8217;s issues is polar opposite of mccain/palin.  sarah palin&#8217;s record while in office- whether it be mayor or governor- has been all about sarah palin.  she has misused her office to advance her religion, her personal vendettas, and apparently, travel about on the taxpayer&#8217;s dime- but damn! the woman can shoot.  </p>
<p>you pumas are a joke.  you can stand up and say that you supported hillary clinton all you want- i call you liars.  you cannot tell me with any degree of believability that you support women and children&#8217;s issues or any issue that hillary clinton has broken the glass ceiling for.  if you were truly interested in championing women&#8217;s issues- and advancing women&#8217;s causes- you would vote for cynthia mckinney- she is actually running for PRESIDENT.  mccain is a misogynist- i mean he called his wife a cunt- nobody squawks about that.  that was only the occasion he got caught.  so, go ahead and try and distract from the real platforms and the real issues- you all were republican sympathizers from the get go.  let&#8217;s lay it out in lavender and stop the lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DealwithIt</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-32090</link>
		<dc:creator>DealwithIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-32090</guid>
		<description>Betty Martin:

Condi Rice was specifically asked if she endorsed McCain and she refused to say who she was voting for. I can&#039;t believe hat sucha hughly educated and accomplished woman would vote for a mentally disturbed man and an an uneducated, uninformed, and incompetent woman. I just don&#039;t see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betty Martin:</p>
<p>Condi Rice was specifically asked if she endorsed McCain and she refused to say who she was voting for. I can&#8217;t believe hat sucha hughly educated and accomplished woman would vote for a mentally disturbed man and an an uneducated, uninformed, and incompetent woman. I just don&#8217;t see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-32089</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-32089</guid>
		<description>Please don&#039;t lump all minority women together either. Some are brave enough to stand with America, McCain, and Palin, like Condi Rice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t lump all minority women together either. Some are brave enough to stand with America, McCain, and Palin, like Condi Rice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/08/30/puma-was-it-ever-about-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-32088</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluebloggin.com/?p=2292#comment-32088</guid>
		<description>Sorry. Meant to say you can&#039;t fight racism with reverse racism, sexism and rewarding Louis Farakkhan at your church. You also can&#039;t fight racism by hurting Israel. Jews march with Blacks for civil rights, but now blacks will not stand with Israel. We must. Barack first said he wanted a divided Jerusalem, then an undivided one and now a divided one again. He doesn&#039;t know what he wants. He flip flops too much. Also, don&#039;t believe he will cut your taxes. Bill Clinton ran on that and when he won said we couldn&#039;t afford it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. Meant to say you can&#8217;t fight racism with reverse racism, sexism and rewarding Louis Farakkhan at your church. You also can&#8217;t fight racism by hurting Israel. Jews march with Blacks for civil rights, but now blacks will not stand with Israel. We must. Barack first said he wanted a divided Jerusalem, then an undivided one and now a divided one again. He doesn&#8217;t know what he wants. He flip flops too much. Also, don&#8217;t believe he will cut your taxes. Bill Clinton ran on that and when he won said we couldn&#8217;t afford it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
