Hat Tip To Citizen Activism Against Sleazy Texas Politics
Man takes law into his own hands
Dripping Springs resident shows how citizens can bypass law enforcement.
Gary Conner … ignited a Travis County grand jury investigation into so-called “ghost voting,” the practice of lawmakers at the Texas Capitol voting electronically for colleagues who are not at their desks.
The investigation wrapped last month with the grand jury issuing a report, condemning the practice and calling on the legislators to stop or change their rules, which prohibit members from voting for each other.
Conner got his criminal complaint considered by a grand jury, bypassing law enforcement and the district attorney’s office in the process. He relied on a seldom-utilized Texas law that allows grand juries, bodies that meet in secret and decides whether there is probable cause to issue indictments charging a crime, to take up criminal allegations from ordinary citizens. Usually, the district attorney chooses the cases presented to the grand jury.
Conner’s effort required persistence with the Travis County district attorney’s office and help from a state judge. It appears to reveal avenues for citizens to have criminal complaints investigated and evaluated directly by a panel of fellow members of the community.
“Now, people realize that the grand jury belongs to us. It doesn’t belong to the DA,” Conner said. “If we’re ever going to get our government back — if it’s a government of the people, by the people and for the people — at some point in time, the people have to be respected.”
… the issue was “too political” to be investigated by the Travis County district attorney’s office, which has the authority to investigate state officials through its public integrity unit. Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle has been accused by some lawmakers of allowing politics to dictate whom he prosecutes, a charge that he has denied.
… a rarely-used part of the Texas Code of Criminal procedure that charges grand juries with investigating matters brought to them by any “credible person.”
Article 20.09 of the code states: “The grand jury shall inquire into all offenses liable to indictment … of which they shall be informed by the attorney representing the State, or any other credible person.”
He approached Nancy Gayle, a longtime grand jury bailiff, and said he wanted to hand his complaint to a member of the grand jury when they were not deliberating. Gayle refused, Conner said, and sent him to the district attorney’s office. (Gayle no longer works as a bailiff and could not be reached for comment.)
Conner said assistants to Earle would not allow him to give his complaint to the grand jury and encouraged him to make his complaint with them. On Feb. 7, Assistant District Attorney Gregg Cox, head of the public integrity unit, wrote Conner stating that his complaint is under review and that “this office will not make any further comment … until the review is completed.” Prosecutors later determined that no crime was committed.
State District Judge Charlie Baird, has been applauded by defense lawyers for what they call standing up to prosecutors, reviewed Conner’s complaint and determined that he had a right to give it to the grand jury.
Baird said it would be ideal for such citizen complaints to go through the district attorney’s office, or at least to be passed by the district attorney’s office to the grand jury members. But in cases when citizens feel they are being denied the ability to make their complaints, he encourages them to approach the judge that has empaneled a sitting grand jury.
A pro-active citizen with determination is what this country needs more of. This is a proud statement for what the Constitution really intended. Law enforcement remains at the mercy of elected politicians, whether those politicians are ethical and law abiding or not. Sometimes it is absolutely necessary to bypass the hands that are ties by politics. Justice is more and more trumped by politically motivated agendas. Money and power must be planted in the right pockets before justice is considered … unless of course, the media can be convinced to intervene. Even the media is at the mercy of politically motivated advertisers, who also buy the politicians. Ordinary citizens can become extra-ordinary if they persist. Get the word out. There are those who will support your efforts to shine a harsh light onto the shadows of sleazy politics.
Sphere: Related Content







July 29th, 2008 at 6:41 am
Good for him.
August 4th, 2008 at 3:03 am
[...] a citizen petitioned the Grand Jury in Texas HERE addthis_url = [...]
September 17th, 2008 at 3:03 am
Hi – I am the aunt of Andrew James Hanlon, an unarmed 20 year old kid who was shot seven times and killed by a Silverton, Oregon police officer. The grand jury found the shooting to be justified. It was not.
The system only works, when there’s a DA that will implement the process fairly and honestly. Is there a DA that can do the job he/she was elected to do?
I’m determined to clean up the grand jury process and/or abolish it from our American INjustice system.
If someone can please help me get in touch with Gary Conner,I could use some guidance of how to go about this in Oregon.
I’d really appreciate it.
September 18th, 2008 at 2:11 am
mel~ i am so excited to read what this man did, in the state of texas~ why can’t we do this in oregon? i have so far, over 50 items of dispute in investigation reports alone. only thing (to start) we need to determine is if the state of oregon allows grand juries to take allegations from citizens.
let’s do this~ please get in touch.
blessings, jstone
September 18th, 2008 at 6:57 pm
To all who want to contact Mr. Conner, please call or email the journalist at Austin-American Statesman who interviewed him and wrote the story.
Steven Kreytak – AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
skreytak@statesman.com; 512-912-2946
BTW – we are in central time
If you get help and have a successful result, please share it so I can put a follow up post. This is a needed trend. Your participation may spread through the country.
December 2nd, 2008 at 11:31 am
Message to Mel and Jane:
I wish I had seen this earlier, and I would have tried to get in touch. First, Mel, I am sorry to hear about your nephews death. And Jane, I do not know if Oregon has the same state statute, but I hope so. You need only to google the State Statutes under “code of criminal procedure” for your state, and start researching. I suggest both you and Mel (for your respective matters) investigate to see if under the code in your state, you are allowed to inform a Grand Juror of an ‘indictable act”.
Then research the method the code sets forth for properly drafting a verified (properly notarized) “criminal complaint affidavit” along with researching how an indictment document can be made “sufficient” to be prepared for the signature of a Grand Jury foreperson in the event that they do vote to indict the actor. (The D.A. cannot be counted on to provide either document. You must prepare them yourself, in pursuance of the code of criminal procedure’s guidelines, but it is SIMPLE to draft them. (If I can figure it out, ANYONE can.)
A District Attorney or State Prosecutor usually will withold any information needed for a Grand Jury to determine actual facts when a public servant is involved. Note I am not claiming that is the case in Mel’s matter, I am only saying that in my observation, that is the case in almost ALL matters if a citizen ever gets past the baliffs. The only way to obtain justice when a public servant is a suspect in a complaint(unless the actor hacked off the D.A. in some manner) is to make sure that you are the person presenting the evidence to the Grand Jury, as they often are not given info which might lead to an indictment unless the D.A. wants it to happen. The D.A. can present whatever evidence they want unfortunately, and can get away with witholding information from the files if they so choose.
Good luck to you, and God Bless.
Gary Conner
December 2nd, 2008 at 7:15 pm
Gary, please come by and visit often. Your insight and experience are sorely needed. No one could have responded better. You are an inspiration.