BlueBloggin

 
 
 
 

Department of Homeland Security Outsources National Security

You have to wonder if Bush, Chertoff and Rice really understand which homeland they are suppose to secure. Obviously, putting the responsibility of digitally fingerprinting all exiting foreign passengers falls on the airline and shipping industry; who will then hire contractors to to do the U.S. Government’s job? The Bush administration has hit the pinnacle of security chaos. We can rest easy now, knowing that we have outsourced the outsource.

In typical Bush administration fashion, the US-Visit Program is an ongoing cluster f*** which Bush wants in place by August 2009. The 34 countries involved are urging Bush to stop the program, stating “the job of boarder and port security should not be the responsibility or cost of the airline and shipping industry.” That’s crazy talk. Why the heck would Bush expect the U.S. Government to fund a U.S. security program for civilians, and American companies responsible for protecting the homeland?

According to the Washington Post

Airlines said the change would cost the industry $12.3 billion over 10 years, not $3.5 billion as the Department of Homeland Security estimated in unveiling the proposal in April. Representatives of the nations affected said it is the duty of the U.S. government, not private companies, to enforce immigration and border security laws, and they raised privacy concerns about companies collecting fingerprints.

This proposal to outsource the core government function of border control at a time that airlines around the world are fighting for their economic survival is both unwarranted and counterproductive,”

  • The alliance, whose 230 members include 78 that fly to and from the United States, said airlines and passengers have spent $30 billion for often duplicative and bureaucratic security measures since 9/11.
  • “This uncoordinated and costly mess can no longer be dismissed as simply ‘the cost of doing business,’ ” Bisignani said. He called on DHS to integrate and streamline five passenger-data-collection programs that include reservation system data, passenger manifest information and immigration and customs forms.

Clive Wright, a senior British Embassy official in Washington, wrote on behalf of 34 governments, saying they “are seriously concerned” about the new fingerprint mandate for private companies. He argued that the requirements pose privacy, liability and business risks to airlines far more costly and difficult than any issues they now face in handling immigration issues.

  • “The implications . . . are so severe they require further consultation, reflection and reworking,” Wright told DHS in written remarks for a June 13 meeting that were later released.

In a message Wednesday to the State Department, the German Embassy said that the collection of fingerprints by private companies should “only be the last resort” and that DHS should maintain full custody over sensitive personal data.

Not to mention the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has written several reports on the Department of Homeland Securities (DHS) US-Visit program. The two most recent reports, December 2006 and February 2008, the GAO’s reported the DHS program “Faces Strategic, Operational, and Technological Challenges at Land Ports of Entry.”

December 2006 report:

“An interim nonbiometric exit technology being tested does not meet the statutory requirement for a biometric exit capability and cannot ensure that visitors who enter the country are those who leave.”

February 2008 report:

“US-VISIT program office has yet to fully define its relationships with other immigration and border management programs. As a result, the department is at increased risk of introducing the inefficiencies and reduced effectiveness that result from suboptimizing how these programs collectively support its immigration and border management goals and objectives.”

So there you have it. Chertoff and Rice have a brilliant plan to appease the GAO, put the burden of collecting digital fingerprints and the cost of protecting U.S. boarders on foreign business.

Further reading and resources:
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Department of Homeland Security: US-VISIT

Sphere: Related Content

3 Responses to “Department of Homeland Security Outsources National Security”

  1. 1
    Texas Progressive Alliance Weekly Round-Up | BlueBloggin:

    [...] Department of Homeland Security Outsources National Security [...]

  2. 2
    Eye on Williamson » Texas Blog Roundup (June 30, 2008):

    [...] NyTexan at BlueBloggin tell us how the Bush administration has hit the pinnacle of security chaos. We can rest easy now, knowing that we have outsourced the outsource; Department of Homeland Security Outsources National Security [...]

  3. 3
    » Texas Progressive Alliance Blog Round-Up: 06/30/2008 - By ¡Para Justicia y Libertad!:

    [...] NyTexan at BlueBloggin tell us how the Bush administration has hit the pinnacle of security chaos. We can rest easy now, knowing that we have outsourced the outsource; Department of Homeland Security Outsources National Security [...]

Leave a Reply

Recent Comments


blog advertising is good for you

via PayPal. Thanks for your support

TPA

Proud member of Texas Progressive Bloggers, a FeedBurner Network.

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Texas-Progressive-Bloggers
Powered by FeedBurner

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from:
Powered by FeedBurner

blogarama - the blog directory

BlogBurst.com

counter hit xanga

James Madison

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe to BlueBloggin by Email

Add to Technorati Favorites

Recent Posts

Archives

 

June 2008
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

One Rule

I encourage comments from all sides. I will not edit any comments. They post as you have written them. However, your comments will be deleted for the following reason only: I will not tolerate racism on any level especially the use of the "N" word.


blog advertising is good for you

The Open House Project

Global Voices: The World is Talking, Are You Listening?

Allies

Blogroll

News Outlets

Vets

World

RSS TruthHugger

RSS Time:Top Stories

RSS BBC

RSS Guardian Unlimited World Latest

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I have posted it here an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The material in this site is provided for educational and informational purposes only. I have made effort to include attribution to the source material.