So You Think You Know The Delegate Count

While the pundits talk about the candidates being tied and focusing on the super delegates, it would be nice if they were all on the same page on the delegate count. The limited patience and attention span of the pundits who can’t wait for the remaining 11 states and territories to have their primaries are rushing the democratic party system of allowing all voters to be heard. And, while we’re at it, trying to figure our who the vice president will be is also very premature.

Remaining primaries and delegates:

March 11 – Mississippi 33 delegates
April 22 - Pennsylvania 158 delegates
May 3 - Guam 4 delegates
May 6 – Indiana 72 delegates
May 6 - North Carolina 158 delegates
May 13 -West Virginia 28 delegates
May 20 - Kentucky 51 delegates
May 20 -Oregon 52 delegates
June 3- Montana 16 delegates
June 3- South Dakota 15 delegates
June 7 -Puerto Rico 55 delegates

Trying to figure out the delegate count for Obama and Clinton depends on which news source or pundit you listen to. They all have different numbers;

CNN
Obama total delegates: 1,527
Pledged: 1,328
Superdelegates: 199

Clinton total delegates: 1,428
Pledged: 1,190
Superdelegates: 238

MSNBC
By the numbers below it appears that MSNBC is using pledged delegates only
Obama 1366
Clinton 1277

Real Clear Politics

State Date Delegates   Obama Clinton  
Total -     1588 1468
 
Super Delegates - 795   210 245
 
Pledged Delegates - 2654   1378 1223

The Green Papers

“Pledged” Delegate Votes (FL, MI sanctioned) = Primaries only
Obama 1,370.5
Clinton 1,229.5

“Soft” Delegate Votes (FL, MI sanctioned) = Primaries and Caucuses
Obama 1,573.5
Clinton 1,473.5

NY Times
Obama 1,500.5
74.1% of the 2,025 needed

Clinton 1,394
68.8% of the 2,025 needed

Obama campaign website
Obama 1392
Clinton 1236

Clinton campaign website
Sorry but there is only a U.S. map with no delegate numbers listed. What’s up with that?

So what’s the correct number and who is really leading? Well that’s another confusing story. The numbers listed above are actually estimates by the pundits and the campaigns based on the percentage that a candidate won in state primaries and caucuses.

The caucus states including Texas, well that’s a whole different story. Caucus numbers for delegates are decided at the state convention which are usually held in June. Iowa will hold it’s State Convention in June and they may have more to say on their caucus numbers. During the Iowa caucus in January, they had several candidates to caucus for and one who received delegates was John Edwards. Edwards won’t be a viable candidate at the Iowa State Convention, so his delegates could go to Obama, Clinton, uncommitted or split.

Confused yet? Let’s look at Texas, while Clinton won the primary she technically did not win Texas since Obama is the projected winner in the caucus. Obama’s numbers from the caucus so far plus his primary delegates will put him three delegates ahead of Clinton. However, the caucus numbers won’t be official until the Texas State Convention in June.

Personally I plan on waiting for the numbers after all of the state conventions are over and all 50 Secretary of State certify the primary votes. Only then will we know what the true numbers are.

Remember the pundits have been wrong this entire primary season there is no reason to believe that they suddenly got a clue.



Sphere: Related Content

8 Responses to “So You Think You Know The Delegate Count”

  1. Does anyone really know how many there for each person, or do we leave it to the establishment and the establishment media to decide!

  2. Larry:
    I prefer to believe the certified votes from the Secretary of State, except Florida.

  3. nytexan, thanks for this very useful post. This is truly an “apples and oranges” problem that I have been trying to ignore. I like your idea about the Secretaries of State. But it will try my patience.

  4. Very nice summary. It’s hard to believe we have over a month before the next contest. If you think conjecture and estimation are rampant now, wait about two weeks! In the absence of any real results, there will be lots of stories about how delegates are awarded and about the polls for the upcoming states. It will be like the run-up to Iowa/New Hampshire all over again.

  5. Tito:
    Thanks. Trying to keep up with the numbers the MSM puts out could make your head explode.

    I’m sure we will see mud slinging and finger pointing for the next few weeks and delegate numbers continually revised.

  6. [...] - Tibet Confronts Angry Chinawhy on Olympic Games At Risk - Tibet Confronts Angry Chinanytexan on So You Think You Know The Delegate Countnytexan on Canada, NAFTA And Obama…Wrong It Was Clintonfrogblog » What little boys are [...]

  7. [...] Recent Comments bosskitty on Olympic Games At Risk - Tibet Confronts Angry Chinanytexan on Clinton Wants To Delay Texas County ConventionsChristopher on Clinton Wants To Delay Texas County ConventionsClinton Wants To Delay Texas County Conventions | BlueBloggin on Clinton Will Sue Texas….How Dubya of You HillaryObama Gains In The Iowa & California Delegate Shuffle | BlueBloggin on So You Think You Know The Delegate Count [...]

  8. [...] nytexan at BlueBloggin looks at the different delegate counts provided by the media and asks So You Think You Know The Delegate Count. [...]

Leave a Reply

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I have posted it here an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The material in this site is provided for educational and informational purposes only. I have made effort to include attribution to the source material.