Another GOP Plan To Screw Veterans

With all of Bush’s moaning and groaning about Congress not sending him the appropriations bill, you would think the republicans in Congress would encourage Bush not to veto the bill which has veterans affairs in it. The GOP continues to show its true colors in their neglect for veterans. Remember they do support the troops. It’s not shocking to the system that Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson is leading the pack of GOP wolves on their slash and burn venture.

Republicans plan to raise a point of order to strike the language on $65 billion bill funding Veterans Affairs and military construction. Bravo turn your backs on the Veterans because two bills have been combined; Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS) and Education departments and Veterans Affairs. The GOP is truly the party of thugs.

  • Senate Republicans said Thursday they would invoke new ethics rules to block Democratic efforts to send to President Bush the first appropriations package of the 110th Congress.
  • Bush and congressional Republicans are protesting Democratic efforts to tie the two measures together, arguing that the majority is holding veterans’ money hostage for an incremental increase in domestic policy programs.
  • “It will be up to Republicans in the Senate whether they want to turn [their] back on our veterans right before Veterans Day,” said Patty Murray of Washington, a member of Senate Democratic leadership who sits on the Appropriations Military Construction and Veterans Affairs subcommittee.
  • “Where does this process take us except to delay getting vital needed funds to our veterans?” said Rep. Roger Wicker (Miss.), ranking Republican on the corresponding House subcommittee.
  • Under the new ethics law, which was enacted in September, sustaining a point of order would strike the offending language, in this case the Veterans Affairs measure. The bill without the offending language would then be sent back to the House for reconsideration. Before the law, sustaining the point of order under Senate Rule 28 would essentially kill the bill.
  • House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) warned that if Senate Republicans sustain a point of order to split the bill, they would be held responsible for holding up funding for veterans and military personnel.

So the GOP thinks that Veteran Affairs is offensive language. I hope the troops hear them load and clear.

Sphere: Related Content

One Response to “Another GOP Plan To Screw Veterans”

  1. 1
    The GOP's VA And HHS Appropriations Stalling | BlueBloggin:

    [...] a previous post, I reviewed how the Republicans plan to raise a point of order to strike the language on $65 [...]

Leave a Reply

Recent Comments

TPA

Proud member of Texas Progressive Bloggers, a FeedBurner Network.

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Texas-Progressive-Bloggers
Powered by FeedBurner


blog advertising is good for you

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from:
Powered by FeedBurner

RSS NPR

RSS Marketwatch

RSS Washington Post

RSS AlterNet

RSS IPS News

blogarama - the blog directory

BlogBurst.com

Xbox 360 Systems at Buy.com!

iPods at Buy.com!

counter hit xanga

James Madison

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe to BlueBloggin by Email

Creative Commons License

Add to Technorati Favorites


blog advertising is good for you

Recent Posts

Archives

 

November 2007
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

One Rule

I encourage comments from all sides. I will not edit any comments. They post as you have written them. However, your comments will be deleted for the following reason only: I will not tolerate racism on any level especially the use of the "N" word.

Allies

Blogroll


blog advertising is good for you

News Outlets

Vets

World

RSS TruthHugger

RSS Time:Top Stories

RSS BBC

RSS USA Today

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I have posted it here in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.